5 Cheapest Cloud Platforms for Fine-tuning LLMs

img
Amit Tiwari
Amit TiwariSoftware Engineerauthor linkedin
Published On
Updated On
Table of Content
up_arrow

Introduction

This document explores five of the most cost-effective cloud platforms for fine-tuning Large Language Models (LLMs).

Fine-tuning LLMs can be computationally expensive, making the choice of platform a critical factor in project budgeting.

We will delve into the pricing models, available resources, and key features of each platform, enabling you to make an informed decision based on your specific needs and constraints.

Why are cloud platforms used to fine-tune large language models (LLMs)?

LLM

Abundant computational resources

Fine-tuning LLMs requires substantial computational power, primarily in the form of GPUs (Graphics Processing Units) or TPUs (Tensor Processing Units). Cloud platforms provide access to a wide range of high-performance computing resources, including:

  • GPU instances: Cloud providers offer virtual machines equipped with powerful GPUs from vendors like NVIDIA (e.g., A100, V100, T4). These GPUs are specifically designed for accelerating deep learning workloads.

  • TPU pods: Google Cloud Platform (GCP) offers Tensor Processing Units (TPUs), custom-designed hardware accelerators optimized for TensorFlow workloads. TPU Pods provide even greater computational power for large-scale fine-tuning.

  • Scalability: Cloud platforms allow you to easily scale your computational resources up or down based on your needs. You can start with a single GPU instance and then scale to multiple GPUs or even a TPU pod as your model and dataset grow.

Without cloud platforms, organizations would need to invest heavily in their own hardware infrastructure, which can be expensive and time-consuming to set up and maintain.

Scalability and flexibility

The size and complexity of LLMs and their training datasets often necessitate a scalable infrastructure. Cloud platforms offer the flexibility to:

  • Scale compute resources: As mentioned earlier, you can dynamically adjust the number of GPUs or TPUs used for fine-tuning based on the model size, dataset size, and desired training speed.

  • Scale storage: Cloud storage services (e.g., Amazon S3, Google Cloud Storage, and Azure Blob Storage) provide virtually unlimited storage capacity for training datasets, model checkpoints, and other artifacts.

  • Parallel processing: Cloud platforms facilitate distributed training, where the fine-tuning process is split across multiple machines, significantly reducing training time.

This scalability is crucial for handling the ever-increasing size of LLMs and the datasets used to fine-tune them.

Cost-effectiveness

While cloud resources come at a cost, they can be more cost-effective than building and maintaining an on-premises infrastructure for fine-tuning LLMs.

  • Pay-as-you-go pricing: Cloud providers typically offer pay-as-you-go pricing models, where you only pay for the resources you consume. This eliminates the need for large upfront investments in hardware.

  • Reduced infrastructure costs: You don't have to worry about the costs associated with maintaining hardware, such as power, cooling, and maintenance personnel.

  • Optimized resource utilization: Cloud platforms allow you to optimize resource utilization by scaling resources up or down as needed. This helps to minimize costs and avoid wasting resources.

  • Spot instances/preemptible VMs: Cloud providers offer discounted pricing for unused compute capacity (e.g., Amazon EC2 Spot Instances, Google Cloud Preemptible VMs). These instances can be used for fault-tolerant fine-tuning workloads, further reducing costs.

Managed services and tools

Cloud platforms provide a range of managed services and tools that simplify the fine-tuning process:

  • Managed machine learning platforms: Services like Amazon SageMaker, Google Cloud AI Platform, and Azure Machine Learning provide a comprehensive environment for building, training, and deploying machine learning models, including LLMs.

  • Pre-built containers: Cloud providers offer pre-built containers with the necessary software and libraries for fine-tuning LLMs, such as TensorFlow, PyTorch, and Hugging Face Transformers.

  • Experiment tracking: Managed platforms often include experiment tracking tools that allow you to monitor and compare different fine-tuning runs, making it easier to identify the best hyperparameters and configurations.

  • Model deployment: Once the model is fine-tuned, cloud platforms provide tools for deploying it to production, making it accessible to users and applications.

These managed services reduce the operational overhead associated with fine-tuning LLMs, allowing data scientists and engineers to focus on the core task of model development.

Collaboration and accessibility

Cloud platforms facilitate collaboration among data scientists, engineers, and other stakeholders:

  • Shared workspace: Cloud platforms provide a shared workspace where team members can access data, code, and models.

  • Version control: Cloud-based version control systems (e.g., Git) allow teams to track changes to code and models, ensuring reproducibility and collaboration.

  • Access control: Cloud platforms provide granular access control mechanisms, allowing you to control who can access and modify data and models.

  • Remote access: Team members can access cloud resources from anywhere with an internet connection, enabling remote collaboration.

Data management and security

Fine-tuning LLMs requires access to large datasets. Cloud platforms offer robust data management and security capabilities:

  • Scalable storage: Cloud storage services can store massive datasets, making them readily available for fine-tuning.

  • Data processing: Cloud platforms provide tools for data processing and transformation, allowing you to prepare your data for fine-tuning.

  • Data security: Cloud providers implement robust security measures to protect your data, including encryption, access control, and compliance certifications.

  • Data governance: Cloud platforms offer tools for data governance, allowing you to track data lineage, enforce data quality rules, and comply with regulatory requirements.

Integration with existing ecosystems

Cloud platforms seamlessly integrate with a wide range of other services and tools, including

  • Data lakes: Integration with data lakes allows you to access and process data from various sources.

  • CI/CD pipelines: Integration with CI/CD pipelines automates the process of building, testing, and deploying fine-tuned LLMs.

  • Monitoring and logging: Integration with monitoring and logging tools provides insights into the performance of fine-tuned LLMs in production.

1. Google Colab

LLM

Google Colab is a free, cloud-based Jupyter Notebook environment that provides access to GPUs and TPUs. While it's primarily designed for educational and research purposes, it can be effectively used for fine-tuning smaller LLMs or for prototyping.

Pros

  • Free access: The primary advantage of Google Colab is its free tier, which offers a decent amount of computational resources, including GPUs like Tesla T4.

  • Easy setup: Colab requires no setup; you can start coding and training models directly from your browser.

  • Integration with Google Drive: Seamless integration with Google Drive allows you to easily access and store your datasets and models.

  • Pre-installed libraries: Colab comes with many popular machine learning libraries pre-installed, such as TensorFlow and PyTorch.

Cons

  • Resource limits: The free tier has limitations on GPU usage, memory, and runtime. Sessions can be terminated due to inactivity or high resource consumption.

  • Unpredictable availability: GPU availability can vary, and you may not always get access to the most powerful GPUs.

  • Limited storage: While integrated with Google Drive, the free storage is limited, and you may need to pay for additional storage.

  • Not suitable for large models: Due to resource constraints, Colab is not ideal for fine-tuning very large LLMs or for long training runs.

Pricing

  • Free tier: Offers free access to GPUs and TPUs with usage limits.

  • Colab Pro: Provides more resources, longer runtimes, and faster GPUs for a monthly fee.

  • Colab Pro+: Offers even more powerful GPUs and longer runtimes for a higher monthly fee.

Use cases

  • Prototyping and experimenting with fine-tuning techniques.

  • Fine-tuning smaller LLMs on smaller datasets.

  • Educational purposes and learning about LLMs.

2. Kaggle Kernels

LLM

Kaggle Kernels, similar to Google Colab, offer a free, cloud-based environment for running code and training models. Kaggle is primarily known for its data science competitions, but its kernels can also be used for fine-tuning LLMs.

Pros

  • Free GPU access: Kaggle provides free access to GPUs, typically Nvidia Tesla P100, for a limited time.

  • Pre-installed libraries: Like Colab, Kaggle Kernels come with pre-installed machine learning libraries.

  • Large community: Access to a large community of data scientists and machine learning practitioners.

  • Datasets: Kaggle hosts a vast collection of public datasets that can be used for fine-tuning.

Cons

  • Limited runtime: Kernels have a limited runtime (typically around 12 hours), which may not be sufficient for long training runs.

  • Resource limits: Similar to Colab, Kaggle has limitations on GPU usage and memory.

  • Competition focus: The platform is primarily geared towards data science competitions, which may not be ideal for all fine-tuning projects.

  • No persistent storage: Kernels do not offer persistent storage, so you need to download your models and data after each session.

Pricing

  • Free tier: Offers free access to GPUs with usage limits.

Use cases

  • Participating in Kaggle competitions that involve fine-tuning LLMs.

  • Experimenting with different fine-tuning techniques.

  • Working with public datasets available on Kaggle.

3. Paperspace Gradient

LLM

Paperspace Gradient is a cloud-based platform that offers a range of services for machine learning, including Jupyter Notebooks, dedicated GPUs, and deployment tools.

Pros

  • Free tier: Paperspace Gradient offers a free tier with limited resources, including a free GPU.

  • Pay-as-you-go pricing: You can pay only for the resources you use, making it cost-effective for short-term projects.

  • Dedicated GPUs: Paperspace offers dedicated GPUs, ensuring consistent performance.

  • Customizable environments: You can customize your environment with the libraries and tools you need.

Cons

  • Free tier limitations: The free tier has limited resources and may not be sufficient for large-scale fine-tuning.

  • Complexity: Paperspace can be more complex to set up and use compared to Google Colab or Kaggle Kernels.

  • Cost management: It's important to monitor your usage to avoid unexpected costs.

Pricing

  • Free tier: Offers limited resources for free.

  • Pay-as-you-go: Pay for the resources you use, such as GPUs and storage.

  • Subscription plans: Offers subscription plans with fixed monthly costs for dedicated resources.

Use cases

  • Fine-tuning LLMs on dedicated GPUs.

  • Developing and deploying machine learning models.

  • Collaborating with teams on machine learning projects.

4. vast.ai

LLM

Vast.ai is a marketplace for renting GPUs from individuals and small businesses. It offers a wide range of GPUs at competitive prices, making it a cost-effective option for fine-tuning LLMs.

Pros

  • Competitive pricing: Vast.ai offers some of the lowest prices for GPUs compared to other cloud platforms.

  • Wide range of GPUs: You can choose from a wide range of GPUs, from older models to the latest high-end GPUs.

  • Flexibility: You can rent GPUs for as long as you need them, from a few hours to several months.

  • Direct access: You have direct access to the rented GPU, allowing you to customize the environment and install any software you need.

Cons

  • Reliability: The reliability of the GPUs can vary, as they are provided by individuals and small businesses.

  • Setup: Setting up the environment and configuring the GPU can be more complex compared to managed cloud platforms.

  • Security: You are responsible for securing the rented GPU.

  • Availability: GPU availability can vary depending on demand.

Pricing

  • Hourly Rental: Pay for the GPU by the hour.

  • Fixed-Term Rental: Rent the GPU for a fixed period, such as a week or a month.

Use cases

  • Fine-tuning LLMs on a budget.

  • Experimenting with different GPUs.

  • Running long training runs.

5. RunPod

LLM

RunPod is a cloud platform that offers on-demand GPU instances for various machine learning tasks, including fine-tuning LLMs. It focuses on providing cost-effective GPU resources with a user-friendly interface.

Pros

  • Competitive pricing: RunPod offers competitive pricing for GPU instances, often lower than major cloud providers.

  • Variety of GPUs: A selection of GPUs is available, catering to different performance and budget requirements.

  • Easy deployment: RunPod provides pre-configured templates and tools for easy deployment of machine learning environments.

  • Community support: A growing community provides support and resources for using the platform.

Cons

  • Availability: GPU availability can fluctuate based on demand.

  • Less mature platform: Compared to established cloud providers, RunPod is a relatively newer platform.

  • Limited region options: The number of available regions might be limited compared to larger providers.

Pricing

  • Pay-as-you-go: Pay for GPU instances by the hour.

  • Reserved instances: Option to reserve instances for a longer period at a discounted rate.

Use cases

  • Fine-tuning LLMs with a focus on cost optimization.

  • Running inference workloads on GPUs.

  • Experimenting with different machine learning models.

Conclusion

Fine-tuning large language models (LLMs) doesn't have to drain your budget.

The five cloud platforms we explored Paperspace, Vast.ai, RunPod, Lambda Labs, and Google Cloud Preemptible VMs offer affordable, GPU-accelerated compute instances ideal for LLM fine-tuning. Choosing the right one depends on your balance of cost, performance, ease of use, and scalability.

Whether you're a solo researcher, startup, or enterprise developer, there’s a budget-friendly option out there to accelerate your AI work.

FAQs

1. What’s the cheapest GPU cloud provider for fine-tuning LLMs?
Image 1

Platforms like Vast.ai and RunPod often provide the most cost-effective options, especially for spot or community GPUs. Pricing can vary by availability and demand.

2. Are spot/preemptible instances reliable for long LLM training jobs?
Image 1

Spot and preemptible instances are cheaper but come with the risk of interruption. For shorter fine-tuning runs or checkpointed training, they can be a great budget choice.

3. Do these platforms support frameworks like PyTorch or Hugging Face Transformers?
Image 1

Yes, all mentioned platforms support major ML libraries, including PyTorch, TensorFlow, and Hugging Face Transformers, either natively or through Docker containers.

4. Which provider is best for beginners?
Image 1

Paperspace and RunPod have user-friendly UIs and pre-built templates, making them ideal for beginners.

5. Can I scale to multiple GPUs on these platforms?
Image 1

Yes, most providers offer multi-GPU instances or cluster support, but pricing and configuration complexity vary. Lambda Labs and Google Cloud offer robust options for scaling.

Schedule a call now
Start your offshore web & mobile app team with a free consultation from our solutions engineer.

We respect your privacy, and be assured that your data will not be shared