Blogs

Table of Content

Published At Last Updated At

Vijesh ChoudhariSoftware Engineer

React Design Patterns and Best Practices

What is the Design Pattern in Reactjs?

Design patterns in React refer to reusable, well-established solutions to common problems that developers encounter when building applications using the React library. These patterns help organize and structure code in a way that promotes maintainability, scalability, and readability.

React revolves around a component-based architecture, where user interfaces are built as modular and reusable components. Each component manages its state, and these components can be composed to create complex UIs. React components blend the roles of "View" and "Controller" from traditional MVC, emphasizing a more declarative and component-centric approach.

While not strictly adhering to established patterns, React's flexibility and simplicity, along with the influence of Flux, contribute to the development of scalable and maintainable user interfaces.

React introduces its own paradigm, emphasizing components and embracing a unidirectional data flow pattern like Flux, providing developers with a powerful and efficient way to build modern web applications.

Commonly used design patterns in React:

Component Composition:
Keep Components Small and Focused is a best practice in React development that emphasizes breaking down your user interface into small, focused components. Each component should ideally have a single responsibility or concern. This approach leads to more maintainable, reusable, and easier-to-understand code.
Here are some strategies to achieve this principle, along with examples:

Single Responsibility Principle (SRP):
Each component should have only one reason to change, meaning it should have a single responsibility or concern. Example:

1// UserContainer.js
2import React, { useState, useEffect } from 'react';
3import UserList from './UserList';
4
5const UserContainer = () => {
6  const [users, setUsers] = useState([]);
7  const [loading, setLoading] = useState(true);
8  const [error, setError] = useState(null);
9
10  useEffect(() => {
11    fetch('https://user-api.com')
12      .then((response) => response.json())
13      .then((data) => {
14        setUsers(data);
15        setLoading(false);
16      })
17      .catch((error) => {
18        setError(error);
19        setLoading(false);
20      });
21  }, []);
22
23  if (loading) return <p>Loading...</p>;
24  if (error) return <p>Error: {error.message}</p>;
25
26  return <UserList users={users} />;
27};
28
29export default UserContainer;

UserList.js

1// UserList.js
2import React from 'react';
3
4const UserList = ({ users }) => {
5  return (
6    <ul>
7      {users.map((user) => (
8        <li key={user.id}>{user.name}</li>
9      ))}
10    </ul>
11  );
12};
13
14export default UserList;

App.js

1// App.js
2import React from 'react';
3import UserContainer from './UserContainer';
4
5const App = () => {
6  return (
7    <div>
8      <h1>User List</h1>
9      <UserContainer />
10    </div>
11  );
12};
13
14export default App;

Explanation:

UserContainer: This component is responsible for fetching data from the API. It manages the loading state, error handling, and passes the fetched data to the UserList component.
UserList: This component is only concerned with displaying the list of users. It receives the users as props and renders them accordingly.

By separating concerns in this way, each component has a single responsibility:

UserContainer handles data fetching and state management.
UserList handles the presentation of the user data.

This approach makes the code more modular, easier to maintain, and adhere to the SRP principle.

Container and Presentational Components:

Divide components into container components (handle logic, state, and data fetching) and presentational components (focus on UI rendering).

Example:

Container Component:

1// PostsContainer.js
2import React, { useState, useEffect } from 'react';
3import PostsList from './PostsList';
4
5const PostsContainer = () => {
6  const [posts, setPosts] = useState([]);
7  const [loading, setLoading] = useState(true);
8  const [error, setError] = useState(null);
9
10  useEffect(() => {
11    fetch('https://post-api.com/posts')
12      .then(response => response.json())
13      .then(data => {
14        setPosts(data);
15        setLoading(false);
16      })
17      .catch(error => {
18        setError(error);
19        setLoading(false);
20      });
21  }, []);
22
23  if (loading) return <p>Loading...</p>;
24  if (error) return <p>Error: {error.message}</p>;
25
26  return <PostsList posts={posts} />;
27};
28
29export default PostsContainer;

Presentational Components:

1// PostsList.js
2import React from 'react';
3
4const PostsList = ({ posts }) => {
5  return (
6    <ul>
7      {posts.map(post => (
8        <li key={post.id}>
9          <h2>{post.title}</h2>
10          <p>{post.body}</p>
11        </li>
12      ))}
13    </ul>
14  );
15};
16
17export default PostsList;

Higher-Order Components (HOC) or Render Props:

Higher-Order Component (HOC) is a pattern where a function takes a component and returns a new component with additional functionality or props. HOCs are a way to reuse component logic, share code between components, and abstract complex logic into more manageable pieces. They are not part of the React API but rather a pattern made possible by the composability of components in React.

How HOC Works:

Takes a Component: A HOC is a function that accepts a component as an argument.
Enhances the Component: The HOC adds or manipulates props, state, or behavior within the wrapped component.
Returns a New Component: The HOC returns a new component that includes the enhancements made in step 2.

Without HOC:

ErrorBoundaryA.js

1// ErrorBoundaryA.js
2import React from 'react';
3
4class ErrorBoundaryA extends React.Component {
5  constructor(props) {
6    super(props);
7    this.state = { hasError: false };
8  }
9
10  static getDerivedStateFromError(error) {
11    return { hasError: true };
12  }
13
14  componentDidCatch(error, info) {
15    console.error('Error in Component A:', error, info);
16  }
17
18  render() {
19    if (this.state.hasError) {
20      return <h1>Something went wrong in Component A.</h1>;
21    }
22
23    return this.props.children;
24  }
25}
26
27const ComponentA = () => {
28  return <div>Component A Content</div>;
29};
30
31export default () => (
32  <ErrorBoundaryA>
33    <ComponentA />
34  </ErrorBoundaryA>
35);
36

ErrorBoundaryB.js

1// ErrorBoundaryB.js
2import React from 'react';
3
4class ErrorBoundaryB extends React.Component {
5  constructor(props) {
6    super(props);
7    this.state = { hasError: false };
8  }
9
10  static getDerivedStateFromError(error) {
11    return { hasError: true };
12  }
13
14  componentDidCatch(error, info) {
15    console.error('Error in Component B:', error, info);
16  }
17
18  render() {
19    if (this.state.hasError) {
20      return <h1>Something went wrong in Component B.</h1>;
21    }
22
23    return this.props.children;
24  }
25}
26
27const ComponentB = () => {
28  return <div>Component B Content</div>;
29};
30
31export default () => (
32  <ErrorBoundaryB>
33    <ComponentB />
34  </ErrorBoundaryB>
35);
36

With HOC:

withErrorBoundary.js

1// withErrorBoundary.js
2import React from 'react';
3
4const withErrorBoundary = (WrappedComponent) => {
5  return class ErrorBoundary extends React.Component {
6    constructor(props) {
7      super(props);
8      this.state = { hasError: false };
9    }
10
11    static getDerivedStateFromError(error) {
12      return { hasError: true };
13    }
14
15    componentDidCatch(error, info) {
16      console.error(`Error in ${WrappedComponent.name}:`, error, info);
17    }
18
19    render() {
20      if (this.state.hasError) {
21        return <h1>Something went wrong in {WrappedComponent.name}.</h1>;
22      }
23
24      return <WrappedComponent {...this.props} />;
25    }
26  };
27};
28
29export default withErrorBoundary;

ComponentA.js

1// ComponentA.js
2import React from 'react';
3import withErrorBoundary from './withErrorBoundary';
4
5const ComponentA = (props) => {
6  return <div>Component A Content</div>;
7};
8
9export default withErrorBoundary(ComponentA);

ComponentB.js

1// ComponentB.js
2import React from 'react';
3import withErrorBoundary from './withErrorBoundary';
4
5const ComponentB = (props) => {
6  return <div>Component B Content</div>;
7};
8
9export default withErrorBoundary(ComponentB);

COMPARISON:

Without HOC:

Repetition: Each component implements the same logic, leading to code duplication.
Maintenance: Any updates to the common logic require changes in multiple places, increasing the risk of inconsistencies.

With HOC:

Reusability: Common logic is encapsulated in an HOC, making it reusable across multiple components.
Maintenance: Changes to the common logic need to be made only in the HOC, simplifying maintenance and ensuring consistency.
Cleaner Components: The components themselves remain focused on their specific functionality, leading to cleaner and more readable code.

Provider Pattern:

The Provider Pattern in React involves using React's Context API to provide a centralized data store to components without the need for explicit prop drilling. This pattern is particularly useful when you have data that many components in your application need access to, and you want to avoid passing that data through multiple layers of components.

Example of how you can implement the Provider Pattern using React Context:

In this example:

We create a context called MyContext using createContext.
We create a MyProvider component that wraps its children with MyContext.Provider. It uses the useState hook to manage shared data.
We create a custom hook called useMyContext that uses the useContext hook to access the context value. This hook makes it easy to consume the context in any component.
In the App component, we wrap our main application component (MyApp) with the MyProvider.
In the MyApp and ChildComponent components, we use the useMyContext hook to access the shared data from the context. The ChildComponent doesn't need to receive the data as a prop; it can directly consume it from the context.

This way, any component within the MyProvider can access and update the shared data without passing it through props explicitly. The MyProvider acts as a centralized data store for the components that need the shared data.

Redux (state Management)
Create Actions: Actions are payloads of information that send data from your application to the Redux store. They are plain JavaScript objects with a type property.
Create Reducer: Reducers specify how the application's state changes in response to actions. They are pure functions that take the current state and an action, and return a new state.
Create Stores: The store is the object that brings actions and reducers together. It holds the state of your application.
Integrate with React: Use the Provider component from react-redux to make the Redux store available to the rest of the application.
Create Connected Components: Connect your components to the Redux store using the connect function from react-redux.
In this example:
- The actions.js file defines two actions: INCREMENT and DECREMENT.
- The reducer.js file contains a reducer that specifies how the state should change in response to these actions.
- The store.js file creates a Redux store using the reducer.
- The App.js file integrates Redux by providing the Redux store to the application using the Provider component.
- The Counter.js file is a React component connected to the Redux store using the connect function. It receives the current count as a prop and dispatches actions to modify the state.
This is a simple example, and as your application grows, you might want to organize your actions, reducers, and store into separate files or folders for better maintainability. Additionally, you can use middleware, selectors, and other advanced Redux features based on your application's requirements.

Folder Structure A well-organized folder structure in a React project is crucial for maintainability, scalability, and collaboration among team members. It helps in finding files quickly, understanding the project's architecture, and enforcing best practices. Below is a suggested folder structure along with explanations of each folder:

/src : Assets (/assets): Store images, styles, fonts, and other static assets.
/components: Reusable, presentational components. Each component gets its own folder.
/containers: Higher-level components or pages that fetch data, manage state, or connect to Redux.
/contexts: React Context API providers and consumers.
/hooks: Custom React hooks.
/redux: Redux-related files.
/services: Functions for interacting with external services (API calls, etc.).
/utils: Utility functions and helper modules.
App.js: Root component where routes and global context providers are often defined.
index.js: Entry point of the application where React is rendered into the DOM.
/tests: Unit and integration tests.
/public: Static assets that do not need processing by Webpack.
/node_modules: Node.js modules installed via npm.
package.json: Project configuration, dependencies, and scripts.

Why it matters:

Readability and Maintainability: A well-organized structure makes it easy for developers to find and understand the code. It reduces the time spent searching for files and components.
Scalability: As the project grows, a structured folder hierarchy allows for easy scaling. New features and components can be added without cluttering the project.
Separation of Concerns: Components, styles, services, and other concerns are separated, promoting a modular and maintainable codebase.
Consistency: Following a consistent folder structure across projects helps developers transition between different codebases more smoothly.
Collaboration: A well-organized structure enhances collaboration among team members. It's easier for multiple developers to work on different parts of the application simultaneously.
Tooling Integration: Many development tools and IDEs expect certain conventions. A standardized structure facilitates better integration with these tools.
Ease of Testing: The structure makes it easier to organize and run tests. Test files can be placed adjacent to the modules they are testing.
Enforces Best Practices: A structured project often encourages the adoption of best practices, such as code splitting, lazy loading, and proper file naming conventions.

In summary, a thoughtful folder structure is an investment that pays off throughout the development lifecycle, making the codebase more maintainable, scalable, and developer-friendly.

Naming Conventions:

Naming conventions in React help maintain consistency and readability in your codebase. Here are some common naming conventions for various elements in React:

Components:
PascalCase: Components should be named in PascalCase (capitalized) to distinguish them from regular HTML elements and make them easy to identify.

1// Good
2class MyComponent extends React.Component {
3  // ...
4}

1// Bad  
2class myComponent extends React.Component { 
3		// ...  
4}

Files:
PascalCase: The file name for a React component should also be in PascalCase, matching the name of the component.

// Good

MyComponent.js

// Bad

myComponent.js

Props:
camelCase: Props should be named in camelCase to maintain consistency with JavaScript conventions.

1// Good
2<MyComponent myProp={value} />

1// Bad
2<MyComponent my_prop={value} />

What are the Benefits of Using Design Patterns in Reactjs?

Using design patterns in ReactJS can offer several benefits, enhancing the development process and making the codebase more maintainable, scalable, and readable. Here are some key advantages of incorporating design patterns in React:

Maintainability:
Design patterns provide a standardized way of organizing code. This consistency makes it easier for developers to understand, maintain, and extend the codebase. When new features are added or changes are required, developers can quickly locate and modify the relevant parts of the code.
Scalability:
Design patterns promote modular and scalable code. Components and structures designed with scalability in mind can be easily extended or adapted to accommodate changes in requirements. This is crucial for projects that need to grow and evolve over time.
Reusability:
Design patterns encourage the creation of reusable components and structures. This means that well-designed patterns can be applied to different parts of the application or even in other projects, reducing redundancy and saving development time.
Readability:
Design patterns often follow best practices and conventions, improving code readability. Developers familiar with the chosen design patterns can quickly grasp the purpose and functionality of different components, making the codebase more accessible to team members.
Collaboration:
Design patterns provide a common language and set of practices for developers working on a project. This commonality facilitates collaboration among team members, as everyone follows similar coding conventions and understands the structure of the code.
Testability:
Many design patterns promote the separation of concerns, making it easier to write unit tests for individual components. Testability is crucial for ensuring the reliability and correctness of the code, especially in larger applications.
Flexibility and Adaptability:
Design patterns make the code more flexible and adaptable to changes. When requirements evolve or new features are introduced, the codebase can be modified or extended without causing extensive rework. This adaptability is particularly valuable in dynamic development environments.
Performance Optimization:
Certain design patterns, such as the use of memoization or optimization techniques like virtualization, can contribute to improved performance. These patterns enable developers to implement optimizations in a systematic and efficient manner.
Error Handling and Consistency:
Design patterns often include error handling strategies and consistent approaches to handling edge cases. This leads to more robust and reliable applications, as developers can follow established patterns for error handling and consistency.
Learning Curve:
For larger teams or projects, using design patterns can ease the onboarding process for new developers. When developers are familiar with common design patterns, they can quickly understand the architecture and conventions of the project, reducing the learning curve.
Cross-Team Collaboration:
In larger organizations where multiple teams may collaborate on different aspects of a project, design patterns provide a common foundation. This facilitates collaboration and ensures that different parts of the application follow similar architectural principles.
Code Quality:
Following design patterns often leads to higher code quality. Patterns help prevent common pitfalls, encourage best practices, and promote the use of well-established coding conventions.

Conclusion:

In the dynamic realm of web development, embracing React patterns transcends the realm of mere coding conventions; it emerges as a strategic decision with far-reaching implications. The significance of these patterns extends beyond the syntax and structure of your code—they become the architectural blueprints that underpin the quality, maintainability, and collaborative nature of your React projects.

Quality is the bedrock upon which every successful application stands. React patterns, by offering best practices and standardized solutions, elevate the quality of your codebase. The resulting consistency not only enhances the robustness of your application but also sets the stage for a more seamless debugging and troubleshooting experience. When developers can rely on a consistent and well-defined structure, the pursuit of code quality becomes an inherent aspect of the development journey.

Maintainability is the linchpin that determines the longevity of any software endeavor. React patterns provide a roadmap for organizing your code in a way that transcends the immediate development cycle. A well-structured codebase, guided by patterns, becomes a living documentation—a narrative that future developers can decipher with ease. This predictability fosters maintainability, ensuring that as your application evolves, it remains comprehensible and adaptable.

Collaboration is the heartbeat of any successful team, and React patterns serve as the shared language that unites developers. When a team adheres to established patterns, it creates a collaborative ecosystem where each member can seamlessly contribute to different facets of the application. The shared understanding facilitated by React patterns not only enhances communication but also accelerates the onboarding of new team members, fostering a sense of unity and productivity.

Incorporating React patterns into your development workflow is akin to laying the foundation for a robust and future-proof web application. It is a proactive investment in the scalability and adaptability of your project. As your application grows and requirements evolve, the strategic decisions embedded in these patterns ensure that your codebase remains agile and ready for change.

In essence, React patterns represent a commitment to the craftsmanship of software development. They embody the collective wisdom of the React community and offer a roadmap for building applications that stand the test of time. By embracing these patterns, you aren't just writing code; you are shaping the destiny of your application, setting the stage for a resilient, scalable, and enduring digital experience.

FAQs:

1. What is the drawback of MVC design pattern?

Complexity: MVC can introduce complexity, especially in large applications, leading to increased interdependencies and potential tight coupling between the View and Controller.
Tight Coupling: Changes in the View may require adjustments in the Controller, and vice versa, leading to less modularity.
Massive View Controllers: Controllers, especially View Controllers in iOS development, can become excessively large, making code harder to understand and maintain.
Limited Data Binding: Traditional MVC lacks built-in support for two-way data binding, requiring explicit code for updating Views when Models change.
Testing Challenges: Testing can be challenging, especially when there's a lack of separation of concerns, making unit testing less straightforward.
Not Ideal for Asynchronous UI: In modern applications with asynchronous updates, MVC might not be the most suitable pattern.

2. What is the role of Higher-Order Components (HOCs) in React design patterns?

HOCs are functions that take a component and return a new component with additional props or behavior. They enable code reuse, logic extraction, and the augmentation of components with shared functionality. HOCs are commonly used for tasks like authentication and code abstraction.

3. Why is it important to follow folder structure conventions in React applications?

A well-defined folder structure enhances code organization and readability. It ensures a clear separation of concerns, making it easier for developers to locate files, components, and resources. Consistent folder structures also streamline collaboration among team members.

4. Is Tailwind good for responsive design?

Tailwind CSS is well-suited for responsive design. Tailwind provides a utility-first approach to styling, offering a wide range of pre-built utility classes that make it easy to create responsive layouts and designs. With Tailwind, you can easily apply responsive classes to control the appearance of elements at different screen sizes.

Tailwind CSS is a powerful tool for building responsive designs due to its extensive set of utility classes and flexible approach. It simplifies the process of creating responsive layouts and ensures a consistent and maintainable styling system across various screen sizes.

5. What is the difference between Redux and flux?

Redux and Flux are both state management patterns for JavaScript applications, particularly in React. Redux, inspired by Flux, features a single immutable state tree, enforcing a more predictable state management system with a single store. It introduces action creators for creating actions and middleware for additional functionality. In contrast, Flux allows multiple stores, embraces more flexibility in state handling, and lacks built-in support for middleware. Redux is often considered more opinionated and structured, while Flux provides a more adaptable approach to state management.