Blogs

calendar img
sandip das
Sandip DasSoftware Engineer at Code Bauthor linkedin

img

Explore the top-notch Rich Text Editors for React in 2023

We were working on a project that needed us to make it easy for people to create and change content. For this, we needed a good Rich Text Editor (RTE) for our React app. Picking the right RTE is like choosing the perfect tool for a job – it makes a big difference.

Our goal was to make it simple for users to edit things, so we explored different Rich Text Editors for React. We wanted to find the one that worked best with our project and made creating content better.

We looked at around 10 different editors, thinking about what each one was good at and where it might have some issues. Our aim was not just to find any solution but to find the one that fit perfectly with what we needed.

Introduction

Rich Text Editors (RTE) play a pivotal role in enhancing user interactions, offering a What You See Is What You Get (WYSIWYG) editing experience. For React developers, selecting the right RTE is crucial for seamless content creation. In this comprehensive guide, we'll delve into the 10+ best Rich Text Editors for React, evaluating their features, pros, and cons to help you make an informed decision for your project.

1. Draft.js

draft-js

Developed and maintained by Facebook, Draft.js provides a robust and extensible framework for building rich text editors in React. Its customizable architecture allows developers to create tailored solutions, making it suitable for various projects. While it may have a steeper learning curve, the strong community support ensures ample resources for overcoming challenges.

Draft.js pros:

  • Developed and maintained by Facebook.
  • Customizable and extensible architecture.
  • Strong community support.

Draft.js cons:

  • The steeper learning curve for beginners.

Website | Demo


2. Slate.js

slate-js

Slate stands out for its high degree of customizability and flexibility, making it an excellent choice for projects with unique requirements. While its performance shines with large documents, developers might find the learning curve steep due to limited documentation. Slate also offers a set of plugins, that empower developers to extend functionality based on their needs.

Slate.js pros:

  • Highly customizable and flexible.
  • Excellent performance for large documents.
  • Provides a set of plugins for extended functionality.

Slate.js cons:

  • Limited documentation compared to other options.

Website | Demo

3. Quill Rich Text Editor

Quill Rich Text Editor

Known for its simplicity and ease of integration, Quill is a feature-rich RTE that supports various formats. With a rich set of customization options, it provides developers with the tools to tailor the editor to their project's specific needs. However, developers should be mindful of potential resource intensiveness, especially for complex documents.

Quill Rich Text Editor pros:

  • Simple and easy to integrate.
  • Supports a variety of formats.
  • Rich set of customization options.

Quill Rich Text Editor cons:

  • Can be resource-intensive for complex documents.

Website | Demo

4. CKEditor 5

CKEditor 5

CKEditor 5 boasts a modern and feature-rich design, complete with a clean and intuitive user interface. It stands out for its collaboration features, making it an excellent choice for projects requiring real-time editing. However, developers should consider the larger bundle size compared to some alternatives.

CKEditor 5 pros:

  • Modern and feature-rich.
  • Clean and intuitive UI.
  • Excellent collaboration features.

CKEditor 5 cons:

  • Larger bundle size compared to some alternatives.

Website | Demo

5. TinyMCE

TinyMCE

As a well-established and widely used RTE, TinyMCE boasts an extensive plugin ecosystem and excellent documentation. While it offers a clean integration process, developers should note that some advanced features are behind a paywall.

TinyMCE pros:

  • Well-established and widely used.
  • Extensive plugin ecosystem.
  • Excellent documentation.

TinyMCE cons:

  • Some advanced features are behind a paywall.

Website | Demo

6. Lexical

Lexical

Lexical is available as a JavaScript framework for use in web browsers, as well as a Swift framework for native iOS development. Lexical is designed for everyone. It follows best practices established in WCAG and is compatible with screen readers and other assistive technologies.

Lexical pros:

  • Highly customizable
  • Minimally built
  • Great optimization
  • Has a wide range of features
  • Great TypeScript support

Lexical cons:

  • Poor documentation
  • Doesn’t support IE11 and older versions of Edge

Website | Demo

7. React Draft Wysiwyg

React Draft Wysiwyg

Built on top of Draft.js, React Draft Wysiwyg is a beginner-friendly option with a straightforward API. It provides theming and styling options, making it suitable for projects where customization is essential. However, developers might find its customizability limited compared to Draft.js.

React Draft Wysiwyg pros:

  • Built on top of Draft.js.
  • Beginner-friendly with a straightforward API.
  • Theming and styling options.

React Draft Wysiwyg cons:

  • Limited customizability compared to Draft.js.

Website | Demo

8. ProseMirror

ProseMirror

ProseMirror offers a robust and efficient document model, making it ideal for collaborative editing scenarios. With a modular design, it provides flexibility for developers. However, its learning curve, particularly for beginners, maybe a consideration when choosing a lexical RTE for a project.

ProseMirror pros:

  • Robust and efficient document model.
  • Great for collaborative editing.
  • Modular design for flexibility.

ProseMirror cons:

  • Learning curve, especially for beginners.

Website | Demo

9. React Summernote

React Summernote

React Summernote is a lightweight lexical option with simple integration into React applications. While it may not offer an extensive set of features compared to some alternatives, its responsiveness and ease of use make it suitable for projects with specific requirements.

React Summernote pros:

  • Simple and lightweight.
  • Integrates well with React applications.
  • Responsive design.

React Summernote cons:

  • Limited features compared to some alternatives.

Website | Demo

10. Editor.js

Editor js

Editor.js takes a unique approach with its block-based editing for structured content. Offering a clean and extensible architecture, it excels in content-heavy applications. Developers should evaluate its suitability based on the project's specific needs, as it may not be the best fit for every scenario.

Editor.js pros:

  • Clean and extensible architecture.
  • Blocks-based editing for structured content.
  • Excellent for content-heavy applications.

Editor.js cons:

  • May not be suitable for all types of projects.

Website | Demo

Conclusions

Choosing the right Lexical Rich Text Editor for your React project involves evaluating factors such as customizability, performance, and community support. Whether you prioritize simplicity, extensibility, or specific lexical features, this guide provides a comprehensive overview. Evaluate each option based on your project's requirements, and embark on a journey to elevate your content creation experience for users in 2023.